Amazon AWS: Not every workload belongs on Azure, and pretending otherwise wastes a client's money.

Not every client environment runs on Microsoft, and not every workload should. When AWS is the better fit, whether due to an existing client environment or a specific service AWS does particularly well, we build there directly rather than forcing an Azure only approach. 

We bring the same architectural discipline to AWS that we apply to Azure: right sizing infrastructure to the actual workload, not defaulting to the biggest or newest service available. 

How we help 

  • Infrastructure hosting: EC2, Lambda, and related compute services sized to your actual traffic pattern. 
  • Storage and data services: S3 and RDS for reliable, scalable data storage. 
  • Migration support: moving existing AWS hosted workloads without the disruption of an unplanned cutover. 
  • Multi cloud integration: connecting AWS hosted services to Microsoft 365 or Azure based systems when a client genuinely operates across both. 

Technology 

  • Amazon EC2, AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, Amazon RDS. 

 

Why it matters 

Our cloud architecture work is grounded in choosing the right platform for the use case, including AWS when a client's existing investment or specific workload makes it the better fit over Azure.

Frequently asked questions

When a specific AWS service is genuinely the better technical fit, or when a client already has significant AWS investment we should not discard.
Yes, multi cloud integration connecting AWS and Microsoft hosted systems is part of our cloud architecture work.
Our deepest expertise is Azure given our Microsoft partnership, but we bring the same architectural discipline to AWS engagements.

Related work